Beyond Easy Believism: Challenging the Shallow Understanding of Justification
A Call to Deepen Our Faith and Embrace the True Depth of Justification in Christ
The Interplay of Faith and Sound Logic: A Reflection on Justification
Audible Introduction
Yesterday, amid the vibrant backdrop of Calvary Community Church in Phoenix, Arizona, I found myself drawn into a contemplative service that, while brimming with enthusiasm, left me grappling with the disconnect between the message delivered and the depth of scriptural truth. Accompanying a young Marine, a guest on his way to Camp Pendleton, I was struck by how our shared confusion during the sermon underscored a larger issue within certain interpretations of faith—namely, those that stem from Reformed theology. Ironically, even though Calvary Community Church does not hold to all of the ideas traditionally associated with Reformed theology, these concepts are often referenced and subtly woven throughout the messages. This experience ignited an internal dialogue about the doctrine of justification—a topic rife with perilous reductionism that frequently prioritizes human intellectual constructs over the holistic and profound nature of God’s ultimate being.
As the sermon progressed, both the young Marine, well versed in scripture, and I exchanged perplexed glances; a silent recognition of the incongruity that unfolded before us. Following the service, our conversation flowed with passion, diving deep into the intricacies of faith and theology as we sought to articulate the sense of dissonance we had both felt. This discussion harkened back to an article I previously wrote regarding “Saved by Grace Through Faith Alone,” where I explored similar theological dilemmas, emphasizing the often-overlooked truths of grace and how they call for a response characterized by righteous action rather than mere intellectual assent.
Contextual Misunderstandings: The Weight of Words
Pastor Mark’s sermon, which drew heavily from Romans 4, attempted to convey that righteousness is attained solely through faith. While this is a biblical principle, the presentation was alarmingly superficial and devoid of vital context. The words “faith,” “righteousness,” and “justification” were treated in such a way that they seemed to strangle the rich narrative of Scripture, simplifying profound truths into palatable yet lifeless phrases.
In the Hebrew tradition, “righteousness” (צדק, tzedek) intertwines with the concepts of justice, ethical conduct, and communal responsibility. It is not merely an abstract state of being but an active engagement with God’s commandments and creation. This understanding shines through in the prophetic call found in Micah 6:8: “He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?” Contrarily, the Reformed emphasis on justification often reduces this call to a mere declaration of legal standing before God, concentrating on human merit and understanding rather than God’s transformative nature.
The danger here lies in how this doctrine, framed as a “get out of jail free card,” diminishes the relational and moral dimensions inherent in the biblical text. While it’s true that Christ’s sacrifice serves as our justification, the implications of that truth extend far beyond a simplistic legal declaration. They beckon us toward a life characterized by transparency and action borne out of genuine faith, rather than one that merely intellectualizes spiritual concepts.
The Relation of Faith and Action
The Hebrew word for faith, אֱמוּנָה (emunah), embodies more than mere belief; it is an active trust and commitment that demands engagement with the Divine and with our fellow humans. This extends beyond the confines of intellectual acceptance into the realm of lived experience. Faith, in this context, is vibrant and relational, shaping not just our thoughts but our actions as well.
In Genesis 15:6, we read, “And he believed in the Lord, and He counted it to him as righteousness.” Here, Abraham’s trust was not passive; it was a trust unto action, a living faith that characterized his journey. This is the depth of faith we find in the Hebrew scriptures—a faith insisting on justice and mercy, a faith demanding ethical living that reflects God’s character.
Justification: A Relational, Not Just Legal, Concept
The flawed notion of justification—צָדַק (tzadak)—transcends legalistic definitions. In Hebrew thought, justification is about relational integrity and aligned living under divine guidance. Much of Reformed theology resists this relational understanding, reducing it to abstract concepts that prioritize human intellectual merit rather than affirming the complexities of God’s being and His covenantal call on our lives.
Isaiah 1:18 paints a transformative picture: “Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow.” Here, justification is interwoven with repentance and a deep desire for change—an alluring invitation to a life lived in accordance with God’s righteousness. It reveals a God who seeks not just to declare us righteous but to lead us toward lives of justice and moral integrity, demanding that our faith resonate through tangible actions.
A Call to Reflect and Reconsider
The sermon at Calvary Community Church stands as a cautionary tale of how easily sound logic can be eclipsed by a shallow theological narrative, particularly when grounded in Reformed theology. Ironically, despite the church’s official stance against fully embracing Reformed tenets, many elements of that theology subtly infiltrate the messages, influencing congregants’ understanding of core doctrines. The concept of justification, when treated as a mere legal matter, estranges believers from the core truths of Scripture, leading them to believe that they are exempt from active participation in their faith. This interpretation not only creates complacency but also opens the door to moral negligence.
Paul’s exhortation in 2 Timothy 4:3 rings alarmingly true in this context: “For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.” This passage serves as a poignant reminder that the pursuit of comfortable, palatable teachings—even when they masquerade as truth—can lead us away from the core of God’s Word. The congregants, seeking assurance of their faith without the weight of responsibility, risk falling prey to diluted messages that do not challenge them to live as Christ instructed.
Paul’s exhortation in Philippians 2:12, to “work out your own salvation with fear and trembling,” compels us to acknowledge the weight of our faith. It is a clarion call to engage earnestly with the complexities of our beliefs and to embody a faith that propels us into action, deeply rooted in the truth of Scripture rather than human constructs.
Final Thoughts
As we navigate the intersection of sound logic and profound faith, let us not shy away from a robust critique of theology that strays from biblical integrity. The Reformed theological stance on justification, when applied carelessly, risks leading believers astray, creating a detachment from the holistic purpose of faith to which Scripture calls us. Ultimately, this journey calls us to seek an understanding of faith that embraces the fullness of God’s transformative nature, one that acknowledges His ultimate being over human intellectualism.
In pursuing deeper truths, may our faith reflect the action-oriented, loving, and just character of God. In a world awash with confusion, let us illuminate our paths with clarity rooted in Scripture, steering ourselves toward a faith that is not merely intellectual but deeply transformative—shaping our actions and our world in alignment with divine justice and mercy. The call is resounding: to embrace a faith that not only justifies but empowers us to live authentically, reflecting God’s character in our lives.
I encourage you to watch the video linked below with some Berean analysis and draw your own conclusions. Let us seek discernment together in our pursuit of truth.
Footnote / Afterthought:
After attending Calvary Community Church intermittently for over thirty years, it is clear that the church’s approach to teaching and ministry has undergone significant transformation. The congregation has moved away from its strong foundation of inductive Bible teaching—an approach that encourages congregants to derive personal meaning directly from Scripture—toward a model in which pastors, particularly Pastor Mark, increasingly use techniques such as simplification, cognitive dissonance, and rationalization.
This shift appears to enhance audience engagement but potentially fosters a misleading sense of confidence in their understanding of faith.
A central issue emerging from this shift is Pastor Mark’s promotion of an “easy believism” understanding of faith, juxtaposed with this week’s somber message centered on the doctrine of justification. He attempts to mollify the potentially distressing implications of his teachings by addressing the emotional responses evoked by his sermon, which serves as an implicit justification/rationalization for an oversimplified view of belief coupled with justification.
Notably, he acknowledges that he has not observed the practical manifestation of the pitfalls of easy belief and justification in the lives of believers; this admission reflects an intentional rationalization of his teaching.
Furthermore, this transition is marked by a focus on emotional resonance rather than rigorous theological engagement, as seen in Proverbs 2:1-5. This shift may lead to a superficial understanding of authentic faith among congregants, particularly among newer believers. For example, when referencing Titus 3, Pastor Mark asserts that he employs inductive teaching; however, he appears to stray from the original context of the text to discuss the topic of justification, which is not the primary focus of the epistle. This trend raises important questions about the implications of such teaching methods for congregational understanding, spiritual growth, and the authenticity of the church’s message from the pulpit.
Titus 3:3–7, occupies a theological centerpiece within the broader context of the epistle, which emphasizes the promotion of sound doctrine and ethical conduct, particularly among church leaders and congregations. This passage reinforces earlier instructions by grounding the call to good works (Titus 2:7, 14; 3:1, 8) in the transformative power of God’s grace.
The Apostle Paul consistently asserts that ethical living is not solely a product of human endeavor but rather emerges from divine renewal (real faith) and salvation. Accordingly, the exhortations to good works, integrity in leadership, and communal harmony throughout the book of Titus are deeply anchored in the salvific grace delineated in this passage, underscoring the inseparable connection between faith and action.
*While I have not attended the Wednesday evening teachings also heavily promoted as inductive, led by Pastor Jason, I have occasionally listened to him during Sunday services and find it reasonable to posit that his teaching aligns with Pastor Mark’s topically enhanced and simplified approach.
Now that circumstances have placed me as a hermit in my home in a new city where I don't know anyone (plus the absence of a vehicle), I find myself watching and listening to Calvary teachers quite regularly on YouTube. In fact, I've come to see myself as an online member of Gary Hamrick's Cornerstone Chapel. I've also listened to a lot of Skip Heitzig's teaching in Albuquerque.
I agree with what you are saying. However, I see a basic place where all the Calvary pastors are dealing with a lack of training.
First, they're not taught how to set up a conversational relationship with the Lord. In fact, they regularly say that the Lord doesn't talk to people these days.
Second, though they acknowledge that the Baptism of the Holy Spirit is a biblical Truth, there is no experiential experience in what that means and in how the Holy Spirit enables us to live much more fully engaged lives in the Spirit.
As a result, their sermons commonly have intellectual merit. However, they rarely have the anointed insight which comes from the Holy Spirit as John shared in 1 John 2:27. Receiving that spiritual help is a practical simple procedure once you've been taught how it works.
Teaching scripture without the help of the author commonly causes intellectual error and trouble that goes far beyond a simple lack of impact.
The spectator religion we are all afflicted with gives no chance for questions and dialog, so the people are forced to take the sermon as the only thing being offered. It's a major problem.
I have been looking for writers who are balanced and demonstrate the Wisdom of the Holy Spirit. Thank you.